Women and Girls with Disabilities in Kenya
Overcoming
Double Discrimination
By: Mary Githinji
This essay explores the double discrimination experienced by women and girls with disabilities in Kenya and proposes practical ways to break these barriers under the “Beyond Barriers” blog theme.
Double
discrimination, also known as intersectional discrimination, refers to the
combined disadvantages that arise when disability and gender intersect. Women
and girls with disabilities experience discrimination, exclusion, and violence
not only because of their impairment but also because of deeply rooted societal
expectations about what women should do and be.
According
to Kenya’s 2019 Population and Housing Census, persons with disabilities constitute
approximately 2.2 % of the population, with women accounting for a higher share
than men. Roughly 57 % of all persons
with disabilities are women.
These women face elevated rates of poverty,
gender-based violence, limited access to education and healthcare .Also systematic exclusion from economic and
political life compared with both men with disabilities and women without
disabilities. Cultural beliefs that still frame disability as a curse or family
shame in some communities further deepen the isolation, especially for girls
who are hidden at home or denied opportunities that their non-disabled sisters
receive. The result is a cycle of marginalization that begins early and often
persists across a lifetime.
In the
Kenyan context, cultural and attitudinal barriers remain powerful. In some
rural communities, families still hides girls with disabilities, leading to
lower school enrolment, higher dropout rates, and limited socialization. Girls
with disabilities frequently encounter bullying, inaccessible school
environments, lack of assistive devices, and teachers unprepared for inclusive
or gender-sensitive pedagogy. Rural areas, where more than 80% of persons with
disabilities live, encounter critical resources constraints. Even when
progressive policies exist, implementation gaps in education mean that many
girls never complete secondary education or progress to vocational skills
training.
Healthcare
presents another critical barrier. Women with disabilities report significant
difficulties accessing reproductive health services, maternal care, and general
medical attention. Physical inaccessibility of facilities which lack of ramps,
adjustable examination couches, or accessible delivery beds, communication
barriers that is absence of sign language interpreters or information in
accessible format, and dismissive or discriminatory attitudes among some
providers all contribute to poorer health outcomes. Contraceptive use among
women with disabilities remains substantially lower than the national average,
and many report being offered limited or forceful options. These barriers
increase vulnerability to unintended pregnancy, obstetric complications, and
gender-based violence, including forms of violence unique to disability such as
denial of assistive devices or forced sterilization
Employment
and economic empowerment remain unattainable for the majority. Despite legal
protections, women with disabilities are often overlooked for formal jobs,
given low paying informal work, or denied promotions. Access to skills
training, credit, and markets is limited. Only a small fraction of public
institutions fully meet the 5% employment quota for persons with disabilities,
and women with disabilities face additional gender biases in hiring and self employment
support.
Socially
and politically, these women experience isolation. They are under-represented
in community decision-making, leadership structures, and political spaces.
Higher risks of sexual and gender-based violence are well documented, yet many
cases go unreported because justice systems are inaccessible or unresponsive to
their specific needs.
Kenya has
made important policy advances. The Constitution (Article 27 and Article 54)
guarantees equality and specific rights for persons with disabilities. The
Persons with Disabilities Act, 2025, marks a significant step forward. It
explicitly recognizes the rights of women with disabilities to participate in
decision-making, protection from sexual and gender-based violence, access to
sexual and reproductive health services, retention and control of fertility,
and the right not to be deprived of their children on grounds of disability. It
also treats denial of reasonable accommodation as a form of discrimination and
strengthens employment obligations.
Success
stories demonstrate what is possible when barriers are deliberately removed.
Stella King’ori, a woman with a disability, transformed a small retail business
through a
TechnoServe
and Sightsavers programme that provided accessible business training, assistive
support, and linkage to supply chains. Her weekly revenue grew dramatically,
she employed others, and she became an advocate for inclusion.
Frashia Muthoni, a visually impaired entrepreneur from Murang’a, built a successful general supplies and construction company that has won government tenders and constructed roads, dispensaries, and classrooms.
In Kilifi
County, organized women with disabilities successfully advocated for specific
budget allocations for empowerment programs, assistive devices, and disability centers, securing
millions of shillings in the county budget.
To
overcome double discrimination, practical strategies are required at multiple
levels. At the individual level, self-advocacy
training, peer mentoring, and leadership programs build confidence and skills.
Community-level interventions should include sustained awareness campaigns in schools, churches, markets, and media
that challenge stigma and promote positive narratives. Faith-based organizations,
which hold significant influence in Kenyan society, can model inclusion by making their spaces and programs fully
accessible.
Institutionally,
teacher training must integrate gender-sensitive inclusive education
approaches. Healthcare facilities need physical accessibility improvements,
trained staff that is sign language interpreters, and respectful, non-discriminatory
service delivery especially for sexual and reproductive health. Employers
require practical support and incentives to meet the 5% quota and provide
reasonable accommodations. Economic programs should deliberately target women
with disabilities with accessible
business skills training, assistive technology, credit, and preferential
procurement opportunities under AGPO (Access to Government Procurement
Opportunities).
Policymakers
and implementers must prioritize enforcement of the 2025 Act, allocate
dedicated resources for women-specific disability programs, improve disability
and gender disaggregated data collection, and ensure meaningful participation
of women with disabilities in the design and monitoring of all relevant
policies. Collaboration between government, OPDs, NGOs such as ATP, United Disabled Persons of Kenya,
and community structures will accelerate progress.
In
conclusion, double discrimination against women and girls with disabilities in
Kenya is a serious but solvable challenge. By addressing the intersection of
gender and disability head on through stronger enforcement of progressive laws,
practical accessible services, economic empowerment, and a cultural shift away
from stigma we create ripple effects that strengthen families, communities, and
the nation.
As future trainers of trainers, we
have a responsibility to equip educators, parents, health workers, employers,
and community leaders with the knowledge, attitudes, and tools needed for
genuine inclusion.
The
“Beyond Barriers” vision is clear: every woman and girl with a disability
deserves dignity, opportunity, and belonging. Let us move deliberately from
policy to practice, from awareness to sustained action. When we empower these
women, Kenya as a whole rises.




Comments
Post a Comment